Probation dismissal guide

Common Myths About Being On Probation

You have heard a few things about probation dismissals that turn out not to be quite accurate.

A few beliefs about probation dismissal situations get repeated often enough that they start to sound like settled fact.

Some of them are close to true, others are not, and the difference matters for what you decide to do next.

Myth, probationers have no rights at all

This is false. Probationers can still bring an unfair dismissal claim under Section 20 if they believe the dismissal lacked just cause or excuse, exactly like any confirmed employee.

Being unconfirmed does not remove this right, though it does affect one specific remedy if a claim succeeds.

Myth, the burden shifts to you during probation

This is also false. Your employer still carries the burden of showing just cause or excuse for the dismissal, the same standard that applies to any other worker1.

You do not need to prove your own innocence first, whatever your confirmation status happened to be at the time.

Myth, any negative feedback automatically justifies dismissal

This is false as well. A single negative review, without a genuine chance to address the concerns raised, may not meet the standard of a fair dismissal on its own. A pattern of clear, consistent feedback is a different matter entirely.

Ask for the specific concerns raised, in writing, and compare them against any targets you were actually given during your time there.

Myth, my probation extending indefinitely means nothing changed

This is also worth questioning. If your probation kept being extended instead of ending in either confirmation or dismissal, that timing pattern can itself be relevant to how your eventual dismissal is assessed.

Bring the exact dates of every extension you received to a lawyer for review alongside everything else.

Myth, a lower remedy cap means there is no point checking

This is only partly true. Back wages for a probationer are capped at twelve months, compared with twenty four for a confirmed employee2. That lower ceiling does not mean no claim exists, only that the financial upside differs.

Understanding your position costs you nothing to explore, regardless of what the eventual remedy might look like.

What should you do this week?

Write down which of these myths you had assumed were true, and check them against your actual situation. Read your rights after a probation dismissal, and confirm your window with the deadline calculator before filing a Section 20 representation.

A lawyer can tell you plainly which of these beliefs apply to your situation and which ones do not.

Common questions

Myth, probationers have no unfair dismissal rights at all. True or false?

False. Probationers can still bring a claim under Section 20 if they believe the dismissal lacked just cause or excuse, the same as any other worker.

Myth, the burden of proof shifts to me during probation. True or false?

False. The burden still rests with your employer to show a fair reason for the dismissal, regardless of your confirmation status.

Myth, any negative feedback justifies a fair dismissal. True or false?

False. A single negative review, without a genuine chance to address the concerns raised, may not meet the standard of a fair dismissal on its own.

Myth, I get less compensation so it is not worth checking my rights. True or false?

Partly true on the numbers, but not on whether checking is worthwhile. A lower cap does not mean no claim exists, and understanding your position costs you nothing to explore.

Sources

  1. In an unfair dismissal case, the burden of proof rests on the employer to show just cause or excuse for the dismissal. Mah Weng Kwai & Associates (accessed 2026-09-22)
  2. Back wages awarded by the Industrial Court are capped at twenty four months for a confirmed employee, or twelve months for a probationer, assessed up to the last day of hearing. DNH (accessed 2026-09-22)

A lawyer can tell you plainly which of these beliefs apply to your situation and which ones do not.